domain_model
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
domain_model [2011/03/23 19:05] – kai | domain_model [2011/03/29 22:50] (current) – [RDF Implementation] michael | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
====== RDF Implementation ====== | ====== RDF Implementation ====== | ||
- | * Graph and Triples here... | + | The abstract domain model has to be expressed to elements offered by a specific data model to be useful. The following illustrates a way to annotate RDF (meta-)data with provenance annotation. |
+ | # Named graph: http:// | ||
+ | @prefix dct: < | ||
+ | @prefix dctype: < | ||
+ | | ||
+ | :MonaLisa dct:format dctype: | ||
+ | dct:creator : | ||
+ | # Named graph: http:// | ||
+ | @prefix dct: < | ||
+ | | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | dct:creator :BnF . | ||
+ | | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | | ||
+ | These triples describe two separate RDF graphs. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following table shows how some of the RDF resources map to their corresponding UML classes of the domain model. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ RDF ^ UML | ||
+ | | :MonaLisa dct:creator : | ||
+ | | < | ||
+ | | < | ||
+ | | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our example consists of two statements about the resource '': | ||
+ | |||
+ | Statements that are part of this graph are considered annotations, | ||
====== Issues and further Ideas ====== | ====== Issues and further Ideas ====== | ||
* Superclass of Description Set necessary? Domain/ | * Superclass of Description Set necessary? Domain/ | ||
domain_model.1300903559.txt.gz · Last modified: 2011/03/23 19:05 by kai