dc-provenance

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
====== Participants ======
Michael, Kai, Daniel, Ömer

====== Minutes ======

  * [17:09] <@kaiec> Topic: ORE Example (Ömer)
  * [17:09] <@kaiec> http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/doku.php?id=use_cases
  * [17:09] <@kaiec> ORE is resource centric in contrast to PMH
  * [17:10] <@kaiec> ORE is somewhat fuzzy for us, as it is not clear where the line between metadata and metametadata is
  * [17:11] <@kaiec> The example is used to illustrate further details
  * [17:14] <@kaiec> The example first describes an article which is an aggregation of an abstract, postscript and pdf
  * [17:15] <@kaiec> Title and Creator is given for the article
  * [17:23] <michaelp2> http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/datamodel#Resource_Map
  * [17:30] <@kaiec> ResourceMap has to be something like a graph in RDF
  * [17:32] <@kaiec> In plain RDF it is something empty, because statements about the aggregation are assigned to the aggregation
  * [17:32] <@kaiec> But it can be used for provenance statements
  * [17:32] <@kaiec> ResourceMap can be seen like DCAM description set
  * [17:41] <@kaiec> Regarding named graphs and self reference: E.g. http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/SWTSGuide/carroll-ISWC2004.pdf p. 8
  * [17:51] <@kaiec> ACTION: Michael adds further examples and graphs to the ORE use case
  * [17:51] <@kaiec> ACTION: Ömer cleans it up and extends it to the next week
  * [17:52] <@kaiec> Next topic: Bachelor thesis
  * [17:55] <@kaiec> Proposed title: Crosswalks towards the First evaluations of the preliminray DCMI Metadata Provenance Model.
  * [18:00] <Daniel__> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Provenance_Vocabulary_Mappings#Provenance_Models
  * [18:04] <@kaiec> The group agrees with the bachelor thesis topic
  * [18:04] <@kaiec> ACTION: Further rework of the documentation on the domain model.