Jan 19th 2011 ====== Participants ====== Kai, Michael, Daniel, Ömer ====== Minutes ====== * [16:12] Topic: Further discussions on the metadata provenance vocabulary * [16:14] Michael: Going back to brainstorming document, should we start a survey of existing handling of data provenance in other metadata formats? * [16:15] Kai: We have to keep it simple. Stick with Dublin Core, and use the other vocabs only to see if something is missing. Other standards are other use cases,. * [16:19] Michael: Two aspects: a standard is a use case and expression of requirements, as wll as a source of ideas. * [16:21] ... If we stick to DC as a touchstone, what about Diane Hillman's concerns about reusing DC properties for metametadata? * [16:21] Kai: Cleaner to reuse; distinction of metadata and metametadata is arbitrary. * [16:22] ... Everything is a resource, metadata is a resource for our purposes like every other resource. * [16:36] <@kai_> Question: Are there examples where DC is used for provenance in general? * [16:45] Kai: Let's finish the domain model as a published draft. * [16:47] ... Then try to test on use cases: * [16:47] Michael: Many out there thnaks to LLD XG and Prov XG * [16:55] Kai: Start with OPM(V); than OAI-PMH. Let's think about what can be expressed with these vocabs what cannot be expressed with our approach. * [16:58] ACTION: Michael to finish a new draft of the model with pseudo-RDF example. * [16:58] ACTION: Daniel to look at OPMV * [16:59] ACTION: Kai to look at OAI-PHM * [17:00] <@kai_> Ömer: OAI-ORE http://www.openarchives.org/ore/ * [17:00] <@kai_> Kai: http://www.openarchives.org/pmh/ * [17:00] ACTION: Ömer to look at OAI-ORE * [17:02] Kai: Let's also think about doing a paper for DC-2011 * [17:03] Kai: Meeting adjourned. * [17:03] Michael: What he said ...:-)