====== Participants ====== Kai, Daniel, Ömer ====== Actions ====== * ACTION: Kai reworks the PMH model (again...) * ACTION: Every example curator: Write a manual with clear instructions how to transfer the source model (OPMV, PMH, ORW) to our model. * ACTION: Everyone has to read the domain model carefully -- and proves it by contributing at least a minor change in the next telco ;-). There we will freeze the model as first public draft. * ACTION: Michael adds further examples and graphs to the ORE use case (from last week) * ACTION: Ömer cleans it up and extends it to the next week (from last week) ====== Minutes ====== * [17:04] <@kai> Topic: Quick Review of use casdes * [17:04] <@kai> OAI-PMH * [17:04] <@kai> http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/doku.php?id=use_cases * [17:10] <@Oemer> Daniel: Is the second Desc. Set a new Set? * [17:12] <@kai> Modified should be created * [17:13] <@kai> Because the modified set is created * [17:13] <@kai> Best place for the modified information would be the dc:source relationship. subproperty? * [17:13] <@kai> ACTION: Kai reworks the model (again...) * [17:14] <@kai> Topic: OPMV Example * [17:14] <@Daniel> http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/lib/exe/detail.php?id=use_cases&media=opmvmetadataexample.png * [17:15] <@Daniel> http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/lib/exe/detail.php?id=use_cases&media=opmvexamplecomplex1.png * [17:33] <@Oemer> Kai: Creator is a subproperty of Contributor * [17:34] <@Daniel> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Provenance_Vocabulary_Mappings#Dublin_Core * [17:37] <@Oemer> Daniel: Process is a series of actions that may or may not produce new artifacts * [17:38] <@Oemer> Kai: Contributer is a "narrower" match to OPMV * [17:39] <@Daniel> *contributor * [17:43] <@Oemer> ... propably not a match, too specific * [17:46] <@kai> ACTION: Every example curator: Write a manual with clear instructions how to transfer the source model (OPMV, PMH, ORW) to our model. * [17:47] <@kai_> ORW=ORE * [17:51] <@Oemer> ACTION: Read and further improve the Domain Model if possible * [17:53] <@Daniel___> At least 1 modification to the domain model for the next week (to prove that we have read it)