Participants: Michael, Kai, Daniel, Ömer, Tom (last 10 minutes)

Scribe: Kai

Summary: We continued the discussion of the various domain model drafts. Mainly driven by the requirement to allow recursively the addition of metametameta…data, we changed the model and focused it more on the DCAM classes. We concluded to like that draft https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14362931/dcprov/domain-model-classes3.png best.

Actions: Michael will clean the last draft and provide a “almost finalized” version, with additional example graph (as simple as the last ones) that illustrates also the possibility to recursively add metametameta…data. Michael provides the versions in the wiki before the telco.

Next steps: In the next telco (Regrets: Daniel), we will try to finalize the draft of the domain model. Daniel will send feedback via email (ideally before the telco).

Minutes:

• [16:06] <@kaiec> Topic: Domain Model
• [16:06] <@kaiec> http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/doku.php?id=domain_model
• [16:09] <michaelp2> Topic: Discuss latest domain model draft (0.4)
• [16:10] <michaelp2> Daniel: How do we implement metametametadata with this draft?
• [16:17] <michaelp2> … from the model perspective, not RDF perspective
• [16:19] <@kaiec> Temporary working model: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14362931/dcprov/domain-model-classes3.png
• [16:27] <@kaiec> http://dublincore.org/architecturewiki/DCAM-2.0
• [16:28] <michaelp2> http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/
• [16:52] <TomB> Kai and Michael, are you there?
• [16:53] <DGarijo> yes, we're on skype
• [16:54] <TomB> I'm on Skype now, tbaker9957 - if it is not too late to stop by and catch the tail end
• [16:56] <@kaiec> ah, ok
• [16:56] <@kaiec> we will add you
• [16:58] <@kaiec> An approach sketched by me: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14362931/dcprov/domain-model-classes3.png
• [16:59] <TomB> I see both models now.
• [17:00] <@kaiec> Michaels draft: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14362931/dcprov/domain-model-classes3-mp.png