Kai, Michael, Ömer

• [16:07] <kai_> Topic: Domain Model
• [16:38] <kai_> Action: Michael adapts the model according to our discussion
• [16:39] <kai_> Description and Statement separated, as in DCAM
• [16:39] <kai_> Identification of DCAM classes
• [16:39] <kai_> Cardinality 0..* for description set
• [16:39] <kai_> … to description, means, a description can exist without description set
• [16:40] <kai_> cardinality annotation set annotation stays at 1, means we REQUIRE annotations to be in a set
• [16:40] <kai_> solutions who can not do that (annotaions in same rdf-xml-file) will probably be allowed but discouraged
• [16:41] <kai_> Classes: DCAM Description Set, DCAM Description, DCAM Statement, Annotation Set, Annotation
• [16:41] <kai_> Annotation inherits from Description
• [16:41] <kai_> Annotation and Drescription aggregate Statements
• [16:48] <kai_> Action: Michael writes some documentation and sends a mail on the mailing list to announce the model as public draft
• [16:49] <kai_> Ömer, Michael and Kai agree on the model as current public draft
• [16:49] <kai_> Topic: OAI-PMH use case
• [16:49] <kai_> http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/doku.php?id=use_cases
• [16:50] <kai_> Example: http://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/madoc/oai2/oai2.php?verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&from=2011-01-01&until=2011-01-20
• [16:58] <kai_> Action: Kai refines the OAI-PMH example
• [16:59] <kai_> Topic: OAI-ORE
• [16:59] <Oemer> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SgJAwgjqtIOCFdB7VDxtQo0nHEoZghBq3RLpKWDzGFc/edit?hl=en&pli=1#
• [17:00] <Oemer> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SgJAwgjqtIOCFdB7VDxtQo0nHEoZghBq3RLpKWDzGFc/edit?hl=en&authkey=CPPK6vIF
• [17:26] <kai_> Action: Ömer searches for an example for ORE and provenance