11:16 michaelp2 Topic: Announcements
michaelp2 Michael: DC-2011, paper and poster proposal was submitted
michaelp2 Kai: Workshop proposal as well.
11:21 michaelp2 Daniel: Provenance WG had their first telco last Thursday. I am in the task force for mapping existing prov vocab to the new Prov Interchange Language.
michaelp2 Topic: Next steps, use cases
11:23 → Oemer_ has joined dcprov
11:25 michaelp2 Michael: My general sense for next steps is 1. extract relevant properties from vocabularies that are in scope 2. cluster them 3. select elements for element vocabulary 4. look for gaps by comparing use cases
← Daniel has disconnected (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
11:26 ← Oemer has disconnected (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
11:27 michaelp2 Kai: I think we have a great use case for RDF graphs. We have to emphasize this statement and probably can go with plain DC for the concrete elements.
→ kai has joined dcprov
11:33 ← Oemer_ has disconnected (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
11:36 michaelp2 Michael: I think we could really go both ways. look at it in terms of a standard AP and cobble an element vocab together; or see it as an extension of the DC core (DCAM) and find a different outlet to formulate it that is not an AP.
11:40 → Oemer has joined dcprov
-
11:43 michaelp2 SWAP
michaelp2 DC-ED
-
→ DGarijo has joined dcprov
-
-
11:50 michaelp2 Kai: I am not sure that we have to do the same work; perhaps we don't want to change definitions. We have the context of metadata, which the context of Dublin Core in general.
11:56 michaelp2 Michael: I think our context is narrower, it is 'metada' provenance. So, at least, we have to refine defitions, like for creator: “Entity responsible for creating the metadata statement about the resource.”
-
11:58 DGarijo ACTION: (ALL) Read the library application profile
12:00 michaelp2 ACTION: Finish example (Daniel)
12:02 michaelp2 Michael: Meeting adjourned