Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- domain_model [2011/03/25 20:19] – [RDF Implementation] michael
+++ domain_model [2011/03/29 18:59] – [RDF Implementation] michael
@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 The abstract domain model has to be expressed to elements offered by a specific data model to be useful. The following illustrates a way to annotate RDF (meta-)data with provenance annotation.
-  # Named graph: http://example.org/data/MonaLisaDescription
+  # Named graph: http://example.org/data/ML-Desc
   @prefix dct: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
+  @prefix dctype: <http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/> .
-  :MonaLisa dct:format <http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage> ;
+  :MonaLisa dct:format dctype:StillImage ;
       dct:creator :LeonardoDaVinci .
-  # Named graph: http://example.org/data/MonaLisaAnnotation
+  # Named graph: http://example.org/data/ML-Anno
   @prefix dct: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
-  <http://example.org/data/MonaLisaDescription> rdf:type dcam:DescriptionSet ;
+  <http://example.org/data/ML-Desc> rdf:type dcam:DescriptionSet ;
       dct:creator :BnF .
-  <http://example.org/data/MonaLisaAnnotation> rdf:type dcprov:AnnotationSet .
+  <http://example.org/data/ML-Anno> rdf:type dcprov:AnnotationSet .
+These triples describe two separate RDF graphs.
+{{:rdf-model.png|}}
 ====== Issues and further Ideas ======
    * Superclass of Description Set necessary? Domain/range problems in OWL, could be circumvented by property/chain inclusion?