Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- f2f_thehague [2011/09/11 09:21] – created kai
+++ f2f_thehague [2011/09/11 09:36] (current) – kai
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==== Face-2-Face Meeting and Workshop in The Hague ====
-The workshop belongs to the [[http://dcevents.dublincore.org/index.php/IntConf/dc-2011|Dublin Core conference]] in The Hague. It will take place on **Friday, 23 September 2011, 14:00 in Room B/C, The National Library of the Netherlands, Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5, 2595 BE The Hague.
+The workshop belongs to the [[http://dcevents.dublincore.org/index.php/IntConf/dc-2011|Dublin Core conference]] in The Hague. It will take place on **Friday, 23 September 2011, 14:00 in Room B/C**, The National Library of the Netherlands, Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5, 2595 BE The Hague.
 === Presentations ===
- * http://www.slideshare.net/kaiec/metadata-provenance
+ * Slides from DC-2010: http://www.slideshare.net/kaiec/metadata-provenance
 === Preliminary Agenda ===
-Metadata Provenance Task Group Workshop / DC-2010
+Metadata Provenance Task Group Workshop / DC-2011
 == First session ==
 Short presentations
-  - on goals and motivation of DC-Provenance Task Group (10 Min)
+  - Presentation of the task group results (30 Min)
-     - separation of data and content
+  - Discussion
-  - of current work done by the W3C Provenance Incubator Group (15 Min)
+  -
-         - user requirements for news aggregator scenario
-         - gap analysis, and possibilities for DCMI to contribute
-  - past work at DCMI (10 min)
-         - ACore / Administrative Components Metadata (http://dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2009/10/seoul/2009-10-16.AdminMetadata.ppt)
-   - DCMIs role and relevance in addressing problems of (metadata) provenance (45 min)
-         - Preliminary definition of metadata provenance in the Dublin Core context
-         - Initial presentation of some typical metadata provenance scenarios (?)
-   - Short discussion about why people are there and what they are interested in, to feed breakout sessions (5 min)
-         - Rationale for and expected outcome of breakout sessions
@@ Line 32: / Line 23: @@
 Breakout sessions around areas of interests
-    * Workshop organizers should try steer discussions towards common problems that might result in to crystallization of use cases (45 min)
+    * Identification of final steps towards the AP draft (45 min)
-    * Reporting back discussions to combined group; identify use cases that might form the basis of user requirements for application profile (45 min)
-       * Basis for work plan of Task Group