dc-provenance

agenda

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2012-06-11T09:34:19+00:00

Agenda for next meeting Topics * Dublin Core - PROV mapping, Feedback Review * ... How to participate * Join the IRC-Chat * Voice will be via Skype, just announce your Skype-ID in the IRC chat

agenda_2010_09_01

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-08-25T15:51:01+00:00

Agenda 2010/09/01 Work out agenda/topics for task group workshop

application_profile

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-08-24T06:35:49+00:00

Based on the Libraries AP: Objectives and scope The main objectives of this application profile are: * Provide the means to represent meta(meta-*)data provenance. * Provide the means to distinguish between provenance information and metadata provenance.

charter

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-07-30T11:58:49+00:00

Purpose The task group aims to define an application profile that allows for making assertions about description statements or description sets. The AP should create a shared model of the data elements required to satisfactorily describe an aggregation of metadata statements in order to collectively import, asses, use and publish facts about the quality, rights, timeliness, data source type, trust situation, etc. of the described statements. Since metadata provenance information is in itself me…

conferences

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2012-05-30T15:01:04+00:00

Phone conferences The conferences are held via IRC and Skype. Archive * 2010/08/25 14:00 UTC: Agenda Minutes * 2010/09/01 15:00 UTC: Agenda Minutes * 2010/09/08 15:00 UTC: Agenda Minutes * 2010/09/15 15:00 UTC: Agenda Minutes * 2010/09/29 15:00 UTC: Agenda Minutes * 2010/10/06 14:00 UTC: Agenda Minutes * 2010/10/27 14:00 UTC:

dc-provenance

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-09-11T09:18:34+00:00

Welcome to the DCMI Metadata Provenance Task Group Wiki Official Website: Metadata Provenance Workshop at DCMI 2011 We organize a workshop on the DC-2011 conference. At this workshop, we will present the results of our work. We plan to close the task group shortly after the conference, so this workshop is the best oportunity to discuss open questions, give us feedback and help to decide on t…

domain_model

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-03-29T20:50:14+00:00

Domain Model This page contains the description and documentation of the domain model that is proposed by the DC-Provenance task group. It is not yet finalized and currently regarded as work in progress. See the revision history of this page for earlier drafts. The group members agreed on the basic model that is presented here on January 26, 2011.

europeana_example

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-11-03T11:55:17+00:00

Europeana Example This example illustrates the translation of a complex datamodel including provenance information into a simpler model without provenance information. The provenance information is expressed via metalevel information. Original Example, taken from the

f2f_pittsburgh

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-11-03T09:06:52+00:00

Face-2-Face Meetiing and Workshop in Pittsburgh The workshop belongs to the Dublin Core conference in Pittsburgh. It will take place on Wednesday, October 20th, 1:30 PM (Time changed!!!) in Break-out room #4, Hilton Hotel, Pittsburgh. Presentations * Preliminary Agenda Metadata Provenance Task Group Workshop / DC-2010

f2f_thehague

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-09-11T09:36:34+00:00

Face-2-Face Meeting and Workshop in The Hague The workshop belongs to the Dublin Core conference in The Hague. It will take place on Friday, 23 September 2011, 14:00 in Room B/C, The National Library of the Netherlands, Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5, 2595 BE The Hague. Presentations

minutes_2010_12_01

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-12-03T16:42:28+00:00

Topic: OPM examples, EDM use case in OPM * [11:14] <@DGarijo> * [11:15] Daniel: Not much real life data out there * [11:16] ... First example is from First Provenance Challenge: * [11:17] ... Karma, OPMToolbox, Tupelo have example graphs, but not real data.

minutes_2010_12_15

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-12-20T12:46:51+00:00

Minutes 2010-12-15 Participants * Participants: Daniel, Michael, Kai * Regrets: Ömer Summary We discussed several drafts from Michael and Kai and finally came up with a first draft that combined the different approaches. Work is documented on

minutes_2010_12_22

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-12-22T16:52:32+00:00

Participants: Michael, Kai, Daniel, Ömer, Tom (last 10 minutes) Scribe: Kai Summary: We continued the discussion of the various domain model drafts. Mainly driven by the requirement to allow recursively the addition of metametameta...data, we changed the model and focused it more on the DCAM classes. We concluded to like that draft

minutes_2011_01_12

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-01-12T16:17:03+00:00

Participants Kai, Daniel Actions Kai: Create Wiki-Pages for use-cases and vocabulary (DELIVERED) Daniel: Send Mail to the Mailing-List regarding the use of DC and call for use-cases/vocabulary elements Minutes * [16:09] <@DGarijo> * [16:11]

minutes_2011_01_19

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-01-19T16:07:49+00:00

Jan 19th 2011 Participants Kai, Michael, Daniel, Ömer Minutes * [16:12] Topic: Further discussions on the metadata provenance vocabulary * [16:14] Michael: Going back to brainstorming document, should we start a survey of existing handling of data provenance in other metadata formats?

minutes_2011_01_26

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-01-26T16:38:27+00:00

Participants Kai, Michael, Ömer Minutes * [16:07] Topic: Domain Model * [16:38] Action: Michael adapts the model according to our discussion * [16:39] Description and Statement separated, as in DCAM * [16:39] Identification of DCAM classes

minutes_2011_02_02

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-02-02T17:55:11+00:00

Participants Michael, Kai, Daniel Mostly discussions about the domain model again, only some notes were written down by Michael afterwards. Minutes * 10:01 michaelp2 Hi Daniel, thanks for adding the definitions. * 10:02 DGarijo no problem=20

minutes_2011_02_09

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-02-09T16:07:03+00:00

Participants Michael, Kai, Daniel, Ömer Minutes * [16:08] Topic: Documentation of the Domain Model * [16:08] Michael started with the documentation * [16:08] * [16:08] ACTION to all: Read carefully and extend until next week

minutes_2011_02_16

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-02-16T17:42:07+00:00

Participants Michael, Kai, Daniel, Ömer Minutes * [17:09] <@kaiec> Topic: ORE Example (Ömer) * [17:09] <@kaiec> * [17:09] <@kaiec> ORE is resource centric in contrast to PMH * [17:10] <@kaiec> ORE is somewhat fuzzy for us, as it is not clear where the line between metadata and metametadata is

minutes_2011_02_23

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-02-23T17:02:35+00:00

Participants Kai, Daniel, Ömer Actions * ACTION: Kai reworks the PMH model (again...) * ACTION: Every example curator: Write a manual with clear instructions how to transfer the source model (OPMV, PMH, ORW) to our model. * ACTION: Everyone has to read the domain model carefully

minutes_2011_03_02

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-03-02T17:18:10+00:00

Participants Kai, Michael, Ömer, Daniel Actions * All: Review Domain model * Use-Case Maintainers: Extend and clean up your cases Minutes * [17:09] <@Daniel> Review of the Use Cases * [17:10] <@Daniel> * [17:10] <@michaelp2> Topic: Another look at OAI-ORE

minutes_2011_03_23

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-03-23T17:01:40+00:00

Participants Michael, Kai, Daniel, Ömer Minutes * [17:04] Agenda: * [17:05] Domain Model: * [17:08] Michael: It is ready for publication, lets publish it * [17:14] We need an illustrating example in RDF with graph visualization

minutes_2011_03_30

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-03-30T16:47:38+00:00

Particpants Michael, Daniel, Ömer, Kai Minutes * [17:10] * [17:12] I do not want to interrupt but it does not work here * [17:24] * [17:40] <@michaelp2> Michael: Can domain model be implemented without named graph for annotation set? I don't think so.

minutes_2011_04_06

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-04-06T16:18:05+00:00

Participants Kai, Daniel, Ömer, Michael Minutes * 11:08 Oemer Topic: Kai's review of OAI-PMH * 11:15 michaelp2 OAI-PMH example * DanielGarijo * * michaelp2 Kai: Important to distinguish what is metadata * provenance and what it not.

minutes_2011_04_13

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-04-14T15:44:11+00:00

Participants * Michael, Daniel * Kai (only at the end) Minutes * 11:23 DGarijo discussion about the project report * 11:24 DGarijo deadline: friday - monday to have a first “readable version” of the paper. * 11:25 DGarijo at least on the specific sections

minutes_2011_05_04

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-05-04T16:11:45+00:00

Participants Daniel, Ömer, Michael, Kai Minutes * 11:16 michaelp2 Topic: Announcements * * michaelp2 Michael: DC-2011, paper and poster proposal was submitted * * michaelp2 Kai: Workshop proposal as well.

minutes_2011_05_11

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-05-11T17:11:22+00:00

Participants Kai, Daniel, Michael Minutes * [17:07] == kai_ [869b245e@gateway/web/freenode/ip.134.155.36.94] has joined #dcprov * [17:15] Topic: Work an an AP, compared to DC LIb Profile * [17:15] * [17:15] EntityRelationshipModel: Basically description of our domain model, almost done.

minutes_2011_05_18

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-05-21T08:16:48+00:00

Participants Daniel, Kai Minutes * [17:03:26] Kai Eckert: Application Profile * [17:03:27] Kai Eckert: * [17:05:17] Daniel Garijo: * [17:11:56] Kai Eckert: Action: Kai will add first examples from the libraries AP to functional requirements/use cases

minutes_2011_06_22

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-06-23T17:36:41+00:00

Participants Michael, Kai, Daniel Minutes * 10:05 Joining chat room... * Started talking in dcprov on Wednesday 6/22/2011 10:05:38 AM * Started talking in dcprov on Wednesday 6/22/2011 10:05:38 AM *

minutes_2011_08_10

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-08-10T16:10:33+00:00

Participants Michael, Daniel, Kai Minutes * [17:13] <@michaelp> * [17:13] <@michaelp> Agenda: Assembling metadata provenance element vocab recommendation: how to move forward? * [17:28] <@michaelp> Kai: First priority is getting ready for the conference. Ask people what approach they would like us to take.

minutes_2011_10_12

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-10-12T16:37:57+00:00

Participants Tom, Corey, Michael, Daniel, Kai Minutes * [17:07] Topic: Relation of Provenance WG and Architecture Group * [17:08] == michaelp [~panzerm@132-174-21-112.ip.oclc.org] has joined #dcprov * [17:09] Tom: Important point is the notion of DS as something like a named graph in RDF.

minutes_2011_12_09

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-12-09T17:27:19+00:00

Participants Kai, Daniel, Tom, Michael Minutes * [17:07] == kai_ [bc6e6cc6@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.110.108.198] has joined #dcprov * [17:07] Tom: Summarizing UNC Meeting with Corey and Jane * [17:08] Tom: Tom and Kai agree to base DCAM on RDF

minutes_2012_01_11

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2012-01-11T19:46:52+00:00

Participants Corey, Michael, Daniel, Kai Minutes * [17:14] * chrpr_ helping scribe * [17:15] <@chrpr_> Architecture list is high traffic * [17:15] <@chrpr_> Starting DCAM Revision * [17:15] <@chrpr_> Determined need for issue tracker * [17:15] <@chrpr_> Kai's taken steps to rethink DCAM in RDF as something similar to SKOS

minutes_2012_01_15

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2012-01-27T17:12:00+00:00

Typo in the URL, this telco was on Jan 25th! Participants Kai, Tom, Corey, Michael (partially) Minutes * [17:08] == kai [bc6e7eb1@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.110.126.177] has joined #dcprov * [17:08] Topic: DCAM * [17:08] * [17:09] Very important to get terminology gap clear between RDF and DCAM

minutes_2012_01_25

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2012-01-27T17:12:49+00:00

The minutes are here: minutes_2012_01_15

minutes_2012_02_08

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2012-02-08T17:19:13+00:00

Participants Kai, Tom, Daniel, Aaron Summary, Actions * From now on, provenance calls will be biweekly, probably intertwined with calls of the DCMI architecture forum regarding the new DCAM. * DC-Provenance will focus on the creation of a mapping between PROV and DC. We will have a close look at the approach for schema.org.

minutes_2012_03_07

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2012-03-07T17:26:36+00:00

Participants Daniel, Tom, Aaron, Kai, Michael, Corey Minutes * [17:04] kaiec Topic: PROV-DC Mapping * [17:04] dgarijo * [17:06] TomB_ q+ to ask about difference between Abstract data model and the ontology * [17:06] dgarijo * [17:07] dgarijo that is the data model

minutes_2012_05_30

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2012-05-30T15:01:41+00:00

Participants Daniel, Michael, Tom, Kai Minutes * [16:07] DGarijo * [16:26] kaiec ACTION to Kai: Summarize results in mail, with timetable * [16:26] kaiec Feedback requested within one week * [16:27] kaiec DC-PROV, PROV, DC-ARCH * [16:29] kaiec ACTION: Recheck mappings primer <> mapping document

news

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-09-30T09:31:07+00:00

News Face-2-Face Meeting and Workshop in Pittsburgh We have scheduled a task-group meeting during the Dublin Core conference in Pittsburgh. It will take place on Wednesday, October 20th, 1:30 PM (Time changed!!!) in Break-out room #4, Hilton Hotel, Pittsburgh. --- Kai Eckert 2010/08/10 10:30

nextmeeting

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2012-07-02T09:22:38+00:00

* Weekly in June, new time slot! * Date: July 4th 2012 * Time (Berlin time, CEST): 16:00 * Topics: Agenda * IRC channel: #dcprov

opm_examples

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-12-05T20:37:12+00:00

OPM Examples Example 1: The First Provenance Challenge. This example shows how a graph inspired from the workflow of the First Provenance Challenge is modeled by OPM: (example obtained from ): In the image, the process of the workflow (PC1 Workflow) can be seen. It uses two different images and two different headers to produce the Artifact

participants

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-03-31T13:47:59+00:00

Participants Daniel Garijo I am a student in the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), currently finishing my thesis for the master in artificial intelligence research. I am interested in the area of provenance, applying some common provenance models (like OPM) in spanish projects under development in UPM.

participate

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-08-06T08:31:28+00:00

How to participate in the DC-Provenance Task Group Regarding the membership in the group, wiki and mailing list, we have adopted the following policy (based on general DCMI practice): * Everybody is invited to join the mailing list and can communicate with the task-group via this way. This is at the same time the preferred way of communication.

protocol_2010_08_25

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-09-01T14:34:14+00:00

Minutes 2010/08/25 Participants: Kai Eckert, Michael Panzer, Diane Hillmann, Daniel Garijo Actions * ACTION: Add relevant literature on metametata to the wiki (Wiki-Page: References) * ACTION: Add participants list to the wiki (Done: Participants) * ACTION: Put agenda together for Pittsburgh meeting of task group

protocol_2010_09_01

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-10-05T17:58:27+00:00

Minutes 2010/09/01 Participants: Michael Panzer, Diane Hillmann, Daniel Garijo, Ed Summers, Thom Baker Actions * ACTION: Send out request for use cases to DC-General and DC-Provenance * ACTION: Try to shift DC-2010 workshop to the two afternoon slots

protocol_2010_09_08

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-10-05T18:26:18+00:00

Minutes 2010/09/08 Participants: Michael Panzer, Diane Hillmann, Daniel Garijo, Thomas Baker Actions * ACTION: Add relevant literature on metametata to the wiki (Wiki-Page: References) --CONTINUED * ACTION: Put agenda together for Pittsburgh meeting of task group

protocol_2010_09_15

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-10-05T18:17:05+00:00

Minutes 2010/09/15 Participants: Kai Eckert, Michael Panzer, Diane Hillmann Actions * ACTION: Put in writing our motivation for starting Task Group (as proto-UC) Minutes * michaelp2: What I had in mind for today was mainly organizational. *

protocol_2010_09_29

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-10-05T18:40:30+00:00

Minutes 2010/09/29 Participants: Kai Eckert, Michael Panzer, Daniel Garijo Regrets: Ed Summers, Diane Hillman Actions * ACTION: Put DC workshop agenda on Wiki * ACTION: Three slides with voiceover for workshop presentation (Michael) * ACTION: Write email to Chris Bizer (Kai)

protocol_2010_10_06

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-11-02T19:10:53+00:00

Minutes 2010/10/06 Participants: Kai Eckert, Michael Panzer, Daniel Garijo Actions * ACTION: Write email to Chris Bizer (Kai) --DONE * ACTION: Three slides with voiceover for workshop presentation (Michael) --CONTINUED * ACTION: Add examples to provisional definition of metadata provenance (Michael)

protocol_2010_10_27

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-11-02T18:25:35+00:00

Minutes 2010/10/27 Participants: Kai Eckert, Michael Panzer, Daniel Garijo Actions * ACTION: Add workshop slides to wiki * ACTION: Work on first draft of domain model (low-key approach) * ACTION: Daniel to talk about some of his OPM use cases.

protocol_2010_11_03

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-11-03T17:17:46+00:00

Actions: * ACTION: Create Starting Point for Extration (Ömer) * ACTION: Extending and correcting the summary (All but Ömer) * ACTION: Provide new examples, including possibly feedback of Antoine (Kai) * ACTION: Try to find real-world models of OPM (Daniel)

protocol_2010_11_10

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-11-10T15:32:20+00:00

Participants: Daniel, Kai Actions: * ACTION: Post summary notes of F2F meeting (Michael) * ACTION: Kai sets up a work plan in the wiki * ACTION: Flesh out the work plan (All) * Actions of last week extended until Nov 24 Minutes: * [16:07] <@kai> Johanna Völker gave a presentation related to our group at the SWPM workshop

protocol_2010_11_17

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-11-17T16:58:15+00:00

Special Telefon Conference on November 17th Presentation of Johanna Völker, held at SWPM workshop in Shanghai. Participants Michael, Kai, Tom Baker, Corey Harper, Ömer, Daniel, Johanna Völker Minutes * [16:06] * [16:06] Topic: Presentation of Johanna Völker, Mannheim University:

references

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-08-25T15:53:29+00:00

References On this page, you can collect all kind of readings and interesting things about related work for our group. ...

resources

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-08-30T14:08:24+00:00

Resources About Provenance * Improving Metadata Quality: Augmentation and Recombination By Diane I. Hillmann, Naomi Dushay, and Jon Phipps. Paper presented at the DC2004 Conference, October 2004, Shanghai, China. Abstract: Digital libraries have, in the main, adopted the traditional library notion of the metadata 'record' as the basic unit of management and exchange. Although this simplifies the harvest and re-exposure of metadata, it limits the ability of metadata aggregators to improve the …

sidebar

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2020-02-27T12:59:25+00:00

Metadata Provenance Task-Group * Official Website * Mailing List * ML Archive * Teleconferences * Participate * News ---------- * Participants * Charter * Timeline * Vocabularies * References * Domain Model * Use Cases * Element Set * Application Profile ---------- Next conference * Weekly in June, new time slot! * Date: July 4th 2012 * Time (Berlin time, CEST): 16:00 * Topics:

start

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-07-30T12:07:12+00:00

Please start at dc-provenance.

telecons

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-09-01T14:58:14+00:00

Past Telecons * 27 Oct 2010: Introduction to the Task Group: Minutes

timeline

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2010-12-08T15:11:19+00:00

Workplan (~6 month, final meeting at DC-2011) * Unordered List Item Basic domain model (January 2011) * Draft element set (February 2011) * Documentation of examples, application to use cases (March 2011) * Comparison / test alignment to “

usageguidelines

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-08-24T07:35:56+00:00

Usage guidelines and examples (DRAFT) The main objective of this page is to provide a provenance publisher the basic idea of what is needed to apply our domain model. Requirements for publishing metadata provenance in RDF (I have started with RDF because is the most common language in the Semantic Web. Other sections like this one can be created).

use_cases

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-06-22T14:04:53+00:00

Use Cases Rationale for new properties, as defined here: Vocabulary Automatic Indexing * Distinct automatically generated metadata statements from manually ones. * Further qualify automatically generated statements. * Proposed properties: dcprov:creationType, dcprov:rank

vocabularies

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-05-17T20:49:44+00:00

Vocabularies Here we collect vocabularies, that are especially usable for the description of additional information for metadata. Provenance in the first place, but not restricted to provenance. * Info service ontology * * Used to describe

vocabulary

Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) — 2011-11-02T19:44:25+00:00

Provenance Metadata Element Set To describe metadata provenance, all of Dublin Core can be used as long as descriptions are part of an annotation set. On this page, we collect properties that we would like to highlight in the application profile. Rationale for them can be found in