application_profile
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
application_profile [2011/05/17 22:25] – [Entity-Relational Model] daniel | application_profile [2011/08/24 08:35] (current) – [Usage guidelines] daniel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | Based on the Libraries AP: http:// | ||
+ | |||
====== Objectives and scope ====== | ====== Objectives and scope ====== | ||
Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
* Users: who want to distinguish from the provenance published by several sources and analyze it. | * Users: who want to distinguish from the provenance published by several sources and analyze it. | ||
====== Functional Requirements ====== | ====== Functional Requirements ====== | ||
+ | Base the examples in http:// | ||
====== Entity-Relational Model ====== | ====== Entity-Relational Model ====== | ||
Summarize the work done in | Summarize the work done in | ||
Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
Also, update it with the work done in the paper. | Also, update it with the work done in the paper. | ||
====== Mapping to other terms/ | ====== Mapping to other terms/ | ||
+ | Summarize some of the work done in | ||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | along with the updates done in the paper. | ||
+ | In the future we wil have to write down the relation between the domain model and the PIL. | ||
====== Usage guidelines ====== | ====== Usage guidelines ====== | ||
+ | How should a content provider publish metadata provenance with our domain model? | ||
+ | The Pubby example is a nice starting point: [[UsageGuidelines|Usage Guidelines]] | ||
====== Encoding syntax guidelines ====== | ====== Encoding syntax guidelines ====== | ||
+ | (This is optional) TBD | ||
====== Examples ====== | ====== Examples ====== | ||
+ | Either summarize/ |
application_profile.1305663949.txt.gz · Last modified: 2011/05/17 22:25 by daniel