• Participants: Daniel, Michael, Kai
• Regrets: Ömer

We discussed several drafts from Michael and Kai and finally came up with a first draft that combined the different approaches. Work is documented on http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/doku.php?id=domain_model.

• [16:04] <kai_> Ömer sent regrets
• [16:18] <@michaelp2> http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/doku.php?id=domain_model
• [16:21] <@michaelp2> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#queryDataset
• [16:27] <@michaelp2> :MonaLisa rdf:seealso :MonsaLisa.rdf
• [16:27] <@michaelp2> :MonaLisa rdfs:seeAlso :MonsaLisa.rdf
• [16:29] <@michaelp2> The FROM NAMED syntax suggests that the IRI identifies the corresponding graph, but the relationship between an IRI and a graph in an RDF dataset is indirect. The IRI identifies a resource, and the resource is represented by a graph (or, more precisely: by a document that serializes a graph)
• [16:29] <@michaelp2> Sparql 8.2.2
• [16:49] <kai_> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14362931/dcprov/domain-model-classes2.png
• [17:09] <@michaelp2> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#structuredproperties
• [17:46] <DanielGarijo> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14362931/dcprov/domain-model-classes2.png