Michael, Kai, Daniel, Ömer

• [17:09] <@kaiec> Topic: ORE Example (Ömer)
• [17:09] <@kaiec> http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/doku.php?id=use_cases
• [17:09] <@kaiec> ORE is resource centric in contrast to PMH
• [17:10] <@kaiec> ORE is somewhat fuzzy for us, as it is not clear where the line between metadata and metametadata is
• [17:11] <@kaiec> The example is used to illustrate further details
• [17:14] <@kaiec> The example first describes an article which is an aggregation of an abstract, postscript and pdf
• [17:15] <@kaiec> Title and Creator is given for the article
• [17:23] <michaelp2> http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/datamodel#Resource_Map
• [17:30] <@kaiec> ResourceMap has to be something like a graph in RDF
• [17:32] <@kaiec> In plain RDF it is something empty, because statements about the aggregation are assigned to the aggregation
• [17:32] <@kaiec> But it can be used for provenance statements
• [17:32] <@kaiec> ResourceMap can be seen like DCAM description set
• [17:41] <@kaiec> Regarding named graphs and self reference: E.g. http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/SWTSGuide/carroll-ISWC2004.pdf p. 8
• [17:51] <@kaiec> ACTION: Michael adds further examples and graphs to the ORE use case
• [17:51] <@kaiec> ACTION: Ömer cleans it up and extends it to the next week
• [17:52] <@kaiec> Next topic: Bachelor thesis
• [17:55] <@kaiec> Proposed title: Crosswalks towards the First evaluations of the preliminray DCMI Metadata Provenance Model.
• [18:00] <Daniel__> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Provenance_Vocabulary_Mappings#Provenance_Models
• [18:04] <@kaiec> The group agrees with the bachelor thesis topic
• [18:04] <@kaiec> ACTION: Further rework of the documentation on the domain model.