Kai, Daniel, Ömer, Michael

• 11:08 Oemer Topic: Kai's review of OAI-PMH
• 11:15 michaelp2 OAI-PMH example
• DanielGarijo
• http://wiki.bib.uni-mannheim.de/dc-provenance/doku.php?id=3Duse_cases
• michaelp2 Kai: Important to distinguish what is metadata
• provenance and what it not.
• michaelp2 … So far, we only have two annotations in the
• example.
• 11:19 ← kai_ has disconnected (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
• 11:21 michaelp2 Action: Michael to look at example graph of
• OAI-ORE use case.
• 11:27 → kai_ has joined dcprov
• 11:28 michaelp2 Kai: Since we cannot express certain things
• (modified source), we could qualify dc:source
• michaelp2 … or create a new property to indicate
• something is a modified description set.
• 11:29 michaelp2 … I would be in favor of extending dc:source
• 11:30 michaelp2 … with a subproperty.
• michaelp2 Action: Kai to modify example re dc:source and
• visualize to indicate descriptions set.
• 11:31 michaelp2 s/descriptions/description
• 11:35 michaelp2 Kai: The PMH triggers to annotation sets, one
• about the original, one about the source.
• 11:47 michaelp2 Topic: Project report
• 11:49 michaelp2 Daniel: Do we have to keep the last para on p. 2
• (that no element vocab is provided)?
• 11:53 michaelp2 … The example provides something like an
• element vocabulary.
• 11:55 michaelp2 Michael: But we still need to hammer out
• concrete specs how an annotation is going to look like: necessary and
• sufficient.
• 11:57 michaelp2 … Two basic questions: How to annotate, and
• how should an annotation look like. Domain model answers only fist
• question.
• 12:06 michaelp2 Michael: Meeting adjourned.